Radiofrequency radiation (RFR) adversely affects wildlife and vegetation as well as people. There is a major proposal to expand the cellular tower presence in Grand Teton National Park. The Environmental Health Trust (EHT) is actively opposing this as is PEER (Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility). EHT has submitted some of the best, well-cited testimony on
At a November 5, 2018 conference sponsored by the UK-based Physician’s Health Initiative for Radiation & the Environment, Dr. Erica Mallery-Blythe hosted a distinguished panel of experts discussing various health aspects of low-level radiofrequency radiation exposure. Along with Mallory-Blythe, presenters included Prof. Anthony Miller, Dr. Dimitris Panagopoulos, Brian Stein CBE, Dr. Sarah Starkey, Prof. Denis
Martin Pall has just published an excellent paper entitled: Wifi is an Important Threat to Human Health, in the journal Environmental Research. In the paper, Pall, a longtime advocate of activated voltage-gated calcium channels as the primary mechanism by which EMF’s act biologically on humans, discusses how repeated wifi studies show the EMF’s causing oxidative
On 3/22/18 the independent Ramazzani Institute (RI) of Italy published partial results of their long-term study (beginning in 2005) on the effects of low level radiofrequency radiation (RFR) exposure to rats. In their significant findings of heart tumors (Schwannomas) in male rats, RI results were similar to those in the National Toxicology Program. Further results
The official National Toxicology Program media release phone call transcript and audio from 2-2-18 are now available : https://www.niehs.nih.gov/news/newsroom/releases/2018/february2/index.cfm Some additional good links here: Link to Dr. Devra Davis on NTP Draft Results: Statement On National Toxicology Program Cell Phone Cancer Study By Devra Davis PhD, MPH https://ehtrust.org/statement-national-toxicology-program-cell-phone-cancer-study-devra-davis-phd-mph/ Link to Dr. Anthony Miller on NTP Draft Results: Cancer Researcher States That
Today [2/2/2018] the National Toxicology Program released their complete draft reports on effects of low level radiofrequency radiation at two frequencies on rats and mice. In a phone announcement NTP officials downplayed results, a very different response from others involved with the study. The NTP’s findings of “some evidence” is the second highest category of severity they have. The
Although the public is assured by the telecommunication industry and regulators they control (i.e. Tom Wheeler former Chair of the FCC was Director of the Cellular Telephone Industry Association) that wireless technology is safe and there is no evidence of its harm, the truth is different. The damage from wireless technology radiation is not potential
A new group, Physicians for Safe Technology, has formed to educate on the health issues associated with digital and wireless technologies. Their vision is a world where technology serves our needs without undermining our physical, psychsocial or environmental health. The PST website at https://mdsafetech.wordpress.com/ provides an excellent additional resource on EMF issues.
EMF Research is an independent research resource into electromagnetic fields (EMF) for public education purposes, focused primarily on Radiofrequency EMF (RF-EMF) and Extremely-Low Frequency (ELF-EMF) fields. This is an excellent resource/research website with links to EMF Portal. Use arrow tabs to navigate. The link below takes you to the EMF Research page of wildlife studies
In ART & WILDERNESS are the preservation of EARTH. In this short smART meter animated film, is ART, telling it like it really is. Just over 4 minutes. Enjoy, I suppose. Pass it on, definitely. Director’s Notes: Our cartoon exposing the truth about Smart Meters is now done and YOU are among the first to
In 2016 the European Academy of Environmental Medicine (EUROPAEM) published their Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of EMF-Related Health Problems and Illnesses. From the abstract: It seems necessary now to take “new exposures” like electromagnetic fields (EMF) into account. Physicians are increasingly confronted with health problems from unidentified causes. Studies, empirical observations, and
Irradiated, an excellent resource from Wireless Action, is a comprehensive compilation and analysis of the literature on radiofrequency fields and the negative biological impacts of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (particularly radiofrequency fields) on biological organisms. It is available here as a pdf and also at the Wireless Action website with other good links: https://wirelessaction.wordpress.com/irradiated/
This 2016 slide presentation by Dr. Martin Pall was presented to the FCC and is part of their docket 13-84. It is an excellent yet often technical summary of one likely source of causation for the impacts of low-level EMF exposures on human health.
Steve Weller from Australia has put together probably the most comprehensive slide presentation on electromagnetic hypersensitivity we have seen. Dated 2015, it covers causes, symptoms, mechanisms, history and more. Excellent graphics as well.
Former USFWS research expert Albert Manville has just written an excellent detailed summary of how wildlife is impacted by RFR. The Manville paper is here.
On July 14th the FCC met and gave expected approval to fifth generation (5G) wireless technologies by opening up for development with minimal restrictions, higher frequency bandwidths know as millimeter waves. Millimeter waves (only millimeters between frequency peaks) can cram in a lot of data and energy in a short space but have minimal penetration.
Olga Sheean a former employee of the World Health Organization in Geneva and now a resident of Vancouver, has written a wonderfully articulate and passionate letter to Gregor Robertson, Mayor of that city, about electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) and the dangers of WiFi proliferation. An excerpt follows and the complete letter can be read here. Our
The following comments are from Dr. Joel Moskowitz, Ph.D., Director of the Center for Family and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley and posted on his website at: http://www.saferemr.com/ . The entire report is linked here. Thirty of 540 (5.5%), or one in 18 male rats exposed to cell phone radiation developed cancer. No
The cell phone cancer controversy will never be the same again. Today Microwave News released an exclusive story http://microwavenews.com/news-center/ntp-cancer-results on the upcoming announcement that rats in a National Toxicology Program study exposed to cell phone radiation developed tumors of the brain and heart. This is the same radio frequency radiation the World Health Organization classified
Your smart meter isn’t necessarily safe or healthy: Maine lives are at risk from the noncancer effects of smart meter-induced radiofrequency radiation. Portland Press Herald: Maine Voices: Read this 3/28/16 opinion piece by Ed Friedman