Reply Briefs were submitted 24 January 2014 in the Maine PUC (NOT)smart-meter investigation into the health and safety of these mandated meters.
Posted here are briefs from the complainants (Complainant Reply Brief 1-24-14-part1 and Complainant Reply Brief 1-24-14-part2) and from intervener Dianne Wilkins (Wilkins Reply Brief 1-24-14). Reply briefs were also submitted by CMP and the Office of the Public Advocate (OPA). All of the briefs are posted at the Maine PUC website as part of docket 2011-00262 (click here to go to the MPUC login page). [You must be on the live page of this article in order for these links to work.]
MPUC Hearing Examiner staff expect to have their Examiner’s Report completed by the end of February, at which time the report will be submitted to the Commissioners as guidance for their final decision on the case.
—submitted 26 January 2014 by Ed Friedman
[Editor’s note: the complainants’ reply briefs are already creating a buzz online!—see, for example, this post by Sky Vision Solutions.]